In Praise of Mivart

ABSTRACT

Carl Resler
The University of Texas
Austin, Texas

January, 2001


 

One hundred years ago, the British zoologist and evolutionist George Mivart was excommunicated by the Catholic Church. Mivart had attempted to reconcile religion with his evolutionary views, and had declared that science lies outside the province of Pope and Church, and that the true priesthood of scientific truth rests with scientific investigators alone.
Today Mivart would more likely be "excommunicated" by the AAAS for his position that natural selection is inadequate to explain evolution. In the 1871 book "Genesis of Species", Mivart responded to Darwin's "Origin of Species" with a list of objections that Darwin took seriously, and Mivart is mentioned in the later editions of "Origin". Mivart argued that a population of organisms has an innate capacity to change form over time (generations) in a way that cannot be described as natural selection working on fortuitous minute variations (Darwinism). Mivart’s most often quoted objection is that natural selection is incompetent to account for the incipient stages of useful structures.
In my presentation I will examine the list of Mivart’s objections to Darwinism. It is my contention that Mivart has gone under-appreciated, and I will make the case that his arguments are still relevant one hundred and thirty years after his book was published. I have made the entire text of "Genesis of Species" available on my web site at www.macrodevelopment.org/mivart.

   


 

 NEXT




Back to Library

Back to MacroDevelopment Home Page